Enriquez, Juan Rudy
This text of Enriquez, Juan Rudy (Enriquez, Juan Rudy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder with malice and sentenced to death. This Court affirmed the judgment of conviction. Enriquez v. State, 429 S.W.2d 141 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968). Applicant's death sentence was later commuted to life.
Applicant contends that: (1) he is actually innocent of capital murder; (2) but for a constitutional violation, no reasonable juror would have found him guilty; (3) he was denied counsel during the period when he could have filed a motion for new trial; (4) he was denied counsel at the plea bargaining stage of his case; (5) the State broke its promise on a 1969 sentencing agreement; and (6) the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
Applicant's third ground is without merit and is denied. His remaining grounds are dismissed. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 4. Accordingly, this application is denied in part and dismissed in part.
Filed: February 27, 2013
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Enriquez, Juan Rudy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enriquez-juan-rudy-texcrimapp-2013.