Enriqueta Castillo v. Mizpah Residential Care, D/B/A La Familia Adult Day Care

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 2013
Docket13-12-00719-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Enriqueta Castillo v. Mizpah Residential Care, D/B/A La Familia Adult Day Care (Enriqueta Castillo v. Mizpah Residential Care, D/B/A La Familia Adult Day Care) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Enriqueta Castillo v. Mizpah Residential Care, D/B/A La Familia Adult Day Care, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00719-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ENRIQUETA CASTILLO, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

MIZPAH RESIDENTIAL CARE, D/B/A LA FAMILIA ADULT DAY CARE, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Enriqueta Castillo, et al., perfected an appeal from a judgment

rendered against them in favor of appellee, Mizpah Residential Care, d/b/a La Familia

Adult Day Care. On January 15, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the

clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on December 19, 2012, and that the deputy district clerk, Jesus Cantu, had notified this Court that appellants failed to make

arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified

appellants of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be

done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellants were advised that, if the defects

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be

dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellants have failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal

is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 28th day of February, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Enriqueta Castillo v. Mizpah Residential Care, D/B/A La Familia Adult Day Care, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enriqueta-castillo-v-mizpah-residential-care-dba-l-texapp-2013.