Enrique Munoz v. State
This text of Enrique Munoz v. State (Enrique Munoz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered October 9, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00914-CR No. 05-13-00915-CR
ENRIQUE MUNOZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F-1333134-K, F-1333106-K
ORDER The record reflects that the trial court did not pronounce the sentences in the presence of
the defendant. Therefore, the trial court is ORDERED to conduct a sentencing hearing for the
sole purpose of pronouncing the sentences in the presence of the defendant, and is further
ORDERED to transmit to this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of this order, a supplemental
reporter’s record reflecting the oral pronouncement of such sentences. We further ORDER that
new judgments with the new sentencing dates be prepared and transmitted to this court in a
supplemental clerk’s record.
These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The clerk
of the court is directed to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Judge Dominique Collins, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court Number 4, Dallas County,
Texas, and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Enrique Munoz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enrique-munoz-v-state-texapp-2014.