Enrique Mata v. State

Opinion

F! eouK ;j SA« AN 2fll50EC-sg?M|i«^ ^ <> I CT

Hr^irja-E V.

^ o

I

^ ^ r-- S S ^ £ J ±i o 8 =! g: 2

riLLD^ f"? 'f

iNTHCCOiirJOr^r^.^ §. ^ ,\T5ANAHTCS1'^:,5?^-r ^ ^ 2015 DEC-9

05

rt

'HE.flSTTLl^:-i*K

S>'

•si U) W O in (i) n h) •si <n 0)

C' 7.i

D

T-uO O P • n IP Cu i'

^3> o 3

n»

o

c:

t U'-

—* ("•;

O

~ H- a >p r- 7^ l«» c.

Tn O

-=& o -T7

P , "O

u ft

t-/ i/^ p § c ^ lA

?rp -+• ro

r> o p so n ir lT

f

f-i'

IP

ra

[y^

LM rr> oo

a

o ^ n c*> O .t -S