Enrique Javier Campos v. West County Detention Facility, et al.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ENRIQUE JAVIER CAMPOS, Case No. 25-cv-06190-RMI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO 9 v. REASSIGN CASE 10 WEST COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, et al., Defendants. 12

13 All named parties, including unserved defendants, must consent before a magistrate judge 14 || has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) to enter a dispositive order in a case. See Williams v. 3 15 || King, 875 F.3d 500, 503 (9th Cir. 2017) (magistrate judge lacked jurisdiction to dismiss case on a 16 || initial review because unserved defendants had not consented to proceed before magistrate judge). 3 17 || This case requires a decision dispositive of one or more defendants or claims, and the consent of 18 || all parties has not been obtained. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall reassign this case to a 19 || district judge pursuant to the court’s assignment plan. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: January 15, 2026 22 Hh |i 23 ROBERT M. ILLMAN United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28