Enrique Carnero v. Billy Joe Ward
This text of Enrique Carnero v. Billy Joe Ward (Enrique Carnero v. Billy Joe Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-13-00118-CV
ENRIQUE CARNERO, APPELLANT
V.
BILLY JOE WARD, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 251st District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 99,785-C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding
July 19, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
Enrique Carnero, appearing pro se, has filed a notice of appeal challenging the
judgment of the trial court in his lawsuit.
By letter of May 23, 2013, we notified Carnero of two matters pertaining to his
appeal requiring immediate attention. First, the filing fee was unpaid. Second,
Carnero’s notice of appeal was untimely although filed within the fifteen-day extension
period authorized by appellate rule 26.3. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. We granted Carnero ten
days, on peril of dismissal, to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence and to file a written explanation of the need for additional time to file his notice of appeal. See
Tex. R. App. P. 5, 26.3, 42.3(a) and (c); Kidd v. Paxton, 1 S.W.3d 309 (Tex.App.—
Amarillo, 1999, pet. denied).
Carnero did not pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence nor did he file a
writing explaining the need for additional time to file his notice of appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal of Carnero is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(a)
and (c).
James T. Campbell Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Enrique Carnero v. Billy Joe Ward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enrique-carnero-v-billy-joe-ward-texapp-2013.