ENRIQUE BENEDICTO PEREZ v. THE ESTATE OF OFELIA REITMAN
This text of ENRIQUE BENEDICTO PEREZ v. THE ESTATE OF OFELIA REITMAN (ENRIQUE BENEDICTO PEREZ v. THE ESTATE OF OFELIA REITMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 3, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1104 Lower Tribunal No. 18-38085 ________________
Enrique Benedicto Perez, et al., Appellants,
vs.
The Estate of Ofelia Reitman, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos Guzman, Judge.
Tepps Treco, and William A. Treco (Plantation), for appellants.
William Wong, P.A., and William Wong, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and reverse and
remand for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 45.032, Florida
Statutes (2022). See § 45.032(3)(b) (“If any person other than the owner of
record claims an interest in the proceeds prior to the date that the clerk
reports the surplus as unclaimed or if the owner of record files a claim for the
surplus but acknowledges that one or more other persons may be entitled to
part or all of the surplus, the court shall set an evidentiary hearing to
determine entitlement to the surplus.”).
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ENRIQUE BENEDICTO PEREZ v. THE ESTATE OF OFELIA REITMAN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enrique-benedicto-perez-v-the-estate-of-ofelia-reitman-fladistctapp-2022.