Enrique Alvarez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 29, 2002
Docket03-02-00008-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Enrique Alvarez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (Enrique Alvarez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Enrique Alvarez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-02-00008-CV

Enrique Alvarez, Appellant


v.



Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 00-FL-198, HONORABLE WILLIAM E. BENDER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R


PER CURIAM

A motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief has been filed. The motion is not signed either by Enrique Alvarez, acting pro se, or a licensed attorney; instead, the motion was signed by a notary public. A person who is not a licensed attorney may not represent Alvarez in legal matters. See Crain v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm., 11 S.W.3d 328, 333 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1067 (2001) (non-attorney may not prepare and file mechanic's liens or lien affidavits on others' behalf); Harkins v. Murphy & Bolanz, 112 S.W. 136, 138 (Tex. Civ. App.--Dallas 1908, writ dism'd) (power of attorney does not authorize one to act as attorney-at-law). However, in the interest of expediting the appeal, this Court will grant appellant the relief he requests. Accordingly, on its own motion, this Court grants an extension of time to file appellant's brief. (1) Appellant's brief is due June 28, 2002. However, we will only file a brief signed by Alvarez on his own behalf or signed by a licensed attorney representing Alvarez. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.1(a) (counsel must sign document for represented party and include State Bar of Texas identification number); 9.1(b) (party not represented by counsel must sign and give mailing address, telephone number and fax number, if any).

It is so ordered May 29, 2002.



Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Do Not Publish

1. This court dismisses the improperly signed motion filed on appellant's behalf.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harkins v. Murphy & Bolanz
112 S.W. 136 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Enrique Alvarez v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enrique-alvarez-v-texas-department-of-protective-a-texapp-2002.