Enquist v. General Datacom

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Enquist v. General Datacom

576 A.2d 539, 215 Conn. 809, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 201

DecidedMay 23, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 576 A.2d 539 (Enquist v. General Datacom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Enquist v. General Datacom, 576 A.2d 539, 215 Conn. 809, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 201 (Colo. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 270, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the workers’ compensation commissioner was not [810]*810authorized to give the employer a credit against all future payments or expenses it may be obliged to make for an injured employee in an amount equal to the employee’s net recovery for that injury against a third party tortfeasor?

Jason M. Dodge, in support of the petition. Decided May 23, 1990

“2. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the workers’ compensation commissioner was not authorized to give the employer a credit against all future payments it may become obliged to make to or on behalf of the employee in an amount equal to the employee’s net recovery from a claim filed against the third party tortfeasor?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 270, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the workers’ compensation commissioner was not [810]*810authorized to give the employer a credit against all future payments or expenses it may be obliged to make for an injured employee in an amount equal to the employee’s net recovery for that injury against a third party tortfeasor?

Jason M. Dodge, in support of the petition. Decided May 23, 1990

“2. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the workers’ compensation commissioner was not authorized to give the employer a credit against all future payments it may become obliged to make to or on behalf of the employee in an amount equal to the employee’s net recovery from a claim filed against the third party tortfeasor?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 A.2d 539, 215 Conn. 809, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enquist-v-general-datacom-conn-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack