Enquist v. Didden
41 App. D.C. 183, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Enquist v. Didden. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 App. D.C. 179 →
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This case differs from the preceding one only in the fact that another instalment of rent is here sought to be recovered. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in the preceding case, the judgment is affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Enquist v. Didden, 41 App. D.C. 183, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1992 (D.C. Cir. 1913).
41 App. D.C. 183 (Enquist v. Didden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.