Enos v. . Eigenbrodt

New York Court of Appeals

Enos v. . Eigenbrodt

32 N.Y. 444

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 5, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 N.Y. 444 (Enos v. . Eigenbrodt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Enos v. . Eigenbrodt, 32 N.Y. 444 (N.Y. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Davis, J.

The appeal in this ease should he dismissed. There is nothing properly here for review. The 268th section of the Code of Procedure provides the mode of reviewing cases tried by the court without a jury, and expressly declares that “ questions, whether of fact or of law, arising upon the trial, can only be reviewed in the manner prescribed by this section.” The printed papers in this action contain no exceptions to any decision on a matter of law arising on the trial, nor any case in conformity to the requirements of the Code or the rules of the court.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis, J.

The appeal in this ease should he dismissed. There is nothing properly here for review. The 268th section of the Code of Procedure provides the mode of reviewing cases tried by the court without a jury, and expressly declares that “ questions, whether of fact or of law, arising upon the trial, can only be reviewed in the manner prescribed by this section.” The printed papers in this action contain no exceptions to any decision on a matter of law arising on the trial, nor any case in conformity to the requirements of the Code or the rules of the court.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.Y. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enos-v-eigenbrodt-ny-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack