Enos v. Boardman

2 Tyl. 271
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1803
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Tyl. 271 (Enos v. Boardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Enos v. Boardman, 2 Tyl. 271 (Vt. 1803).

Opinion

Note. The Court have considered, that the right of review is derived entirely from, and must be regulated in extent by the statute.

Section 3. of the judiciary act provides, that in all civil causes, originally commenced before the County Court, either party shall have liberty to appeal from the judgment of said Court unto the first stated session of the Supreme Court of Judicature then next [272]*272to be holden within and for the same County ; or once and no more, to review his cause at the next stated session of the same County Court, and either party shall have liberty to review his cause at the next stated or adjourned session of the Supreme Court in the same County.

Here the only cases where the right of review is given by the statute in the Supreme Court, are in such civil causes as were originally commenced before the County Court. This Court having original jurisdiction of writs of error, they are not within the purview of the statute....Reporter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Turner v. Circuit Court for Ozaukee County
38 N.W. 192 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)
Jewett v. Dringer
31 N.J. Eq. 586 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Tyl. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enos-v-boardman-vt-1803.