Enochs v. Kitchen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Enochs v. Kitchen

277 S.W.3d 358, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, 2009 WL 580311

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 2009·No. WD 69207·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kimberlee Ann Enochs appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Respondents Richard, Brandy Jo, and Jessie Kitchen on Appellant’s petition for constructive trust. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the motion for summary judgment and the response thereto show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Appellant’s constructive trust claim. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kimberlee Ann Enochs appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Respondents Richard, Brandy Jo, and Jessie Kitchen on Appellant’s petition for constructive trust. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the motion for summary judgment and the response thereto show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Appellant’s constructive trust claim. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Enochs v. Kitchen, 277 S.W.3d 358, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, 2009 WL 580311 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

277 S.W.3d 358 (Enochs v. Kitchen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.