Eno v. Frank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eno v. Frank

49 A.D.2d 906, 373 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11142

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1975·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of respondent, dated November 19,1974, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and fined him three days’ pay. Determination annulled, on the law, with costs, and charge dismissed. In our opinion, the determination is not supported by substantial evidence (CPLR 7803, subd 4). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of respondent, dated November 19,1974, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and fined him three days’ pay. Determination annulled, on the law, with costs, and charge dismissed. In our opinion, the determination is not supported by substantial evidence (CPLR 7803, subd 4). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Eno v. Frank, 49 A.D.2d 906, 373 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

49 A.D.2d 906 (Eno v. Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.