Ennis v. State

273 S.W. 1117
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ennis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Tex. Crim. 44
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 24, 1925·No. No. 9575·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Bell county of burglary, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary. The state moves to dismiss this appeal because of the escape of appellant from confinement, since conviction. The rqotion is supported by the affidavit of the sheriff of said county, showing that on the night of March 9, 1925, appellant escaped from his custody, and has not since been recaptured or returned. The affidavit is dated March 31, 1925. Our statute provides for the dismissal requested, when there is such an escape and no return of the prisoner to the custody of the officer as provided in article 912, C. C. P. The motion is granted, and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ennis v. State, 273 S.W. 1117 (Tex. 1925).

273 S.W. 1117 (Ennis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.