Enlite Products Co. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 818, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1320
This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 818 (Enlite Products Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Enlite Products Co. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 818, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1320 (cusc 1966).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hand operated (not battery operated) sirens of the same kind in all material respects as those the subject of Oxford International Corp. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 69607), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oxford Int'l. Corp. v. United States
55 Cust. Ct. 472 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 Cust. Ct. 818, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enlite-products-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.