Enlite Products Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Enlite Products Co. v. United States

47 Cust. Ct. 357

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 6, 1961

DocketNo. 66193; protest 59/34561 (Philadelphia)

StatusPublished

This text of 47 Cust. Ct. 357 (Enlite Products Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Enlite Products Co. v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 357 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of noneellulosic plastic streamers used on the ends of handlebars of bicycles or velocipedes similar in use to streamers in chief value of steel, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of noneellulosic plastic streamers used on the ends of handlebars of bicycles or velocipedes similar in use to streamers in chief value of steel, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 Cust. Ct. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enlite-products-co-v-united-states-cusc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack