Enlin Steel Corp. v. United States
This text of 2004 CIT 76 (Enlin Steel Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 04-76
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: GREGORY W. CARMAN
____________________________________ : ENLIN STEEL CORPORATION, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Court No. 02-00466 : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : : ____________________________________:
JUDGMENT ORDER
Upon Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of May 5,
2004, based upon the grounds that Plaintiff failed to pay all liquidated duties, charges, or
exactions prior to commencement of this action as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2637(a), and upon
Plaintiff’s failure to present evidence to the contrary, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that this action is dismissed.
/s/ Gregory W. Carman
Dated: June 24, 2004 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2004 CIT 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enlin-steel-corp-v-united-states-cit-2004.