Enhance A Colour Corp. v. IB Communications, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Enhance A Colour Corp. v. IB Communications, Inc.

248 A.D.2d 429, 668 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2350

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover on an account stated, the defendants IB Communications, Inc., and F.T.D. Publishing, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered March 26, 1997, which denied their motion for an order determining that the instant action had been settled against all parties based upon a stipulation of settlement dated [430] September 30, 1996, entered into by the plaintiff and the appellants, and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to enter judgment against the appellants in the principal sum of $20,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There is nothing in the plain language of the stipulation of settlement entered into by the plaintiff and the appellants to indicate that it applied to the codefendants American Publishing Corp. and David E. Moore. Contrary to the appellants’ contention, General Obligations Law § 15-105 (1) does not apply to the facts of this case.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover on an account stated, the defendants IB Communications, Inc., and F.T.D. Publishing, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered March 26, 1997, which denied their motion for an order determining that the instant action had been settled against all parties based upon a stipulation of settlement dated [430] September 30, 1996, entered into by the plaintiff and the appellants, and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to enter judgment against the appellants in the principal sum of $20,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There is nothing in the plain language of the stipulation of settlement entered into by the plaintiff and the appellants to indicate that it applied to the codefendants American Publishing Corp. and David E. Moore. Contrary to the appellants’ contention, General Obligations Law § 15-105 (1) does not apply to the facts of this case.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Enhance A Colour Corp. v. IB Communications, Inc., 248 A.D.2d 429, 668 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

248 A.D.2d 429 (Enhance A Colour Corp. v. IB Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related