Engstrom v. City of Mobile

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Engstrom v. City of Mobile

243 So. 2d 529, 46 Ala. App. 445, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 421

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 12, 1971

Docket1 Div. 14

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 2d 529 (Engstrom v. City of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Engstrom v. City of Mobile, 243 So. 2d 529, 46 Ala. App. 445, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 421 (Ala. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

ALMON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of possessing obscene printed matter in violation of a Mobile City Ordinance.

No assignments of error appear in the record filed in this Court. For this reason the judgment appealed from is due to be affirmed. Ray v. City of Prichard, 45 Ala.App. 32, 222 So.2d 345, cert. denied Ala., 222 So.2d 346; Parks v. City of Montgomery, 38 Ala.App. 681, 92 So.2d 683.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALMON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of possessing obscene printed matter in violation of a Mobile City Ordinance.

No assignments of error appear in the record filed in this Court. For this reason the judgment appealed from is due to be affirmed. Ray v. City of Prichard, 45 Ala.App. 32, 222 So.2d 345, cert. denied Ala., 222 So.2d 346; Parks v. City of Montgomery, 38 Ala.App. 681, 92 So.2d 683.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 2d 529, 46 Ala. App. 445, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engstrom-v-city-of-mobile-alacrimapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack