English, William Hosea
This text of English, William Hosea (English, William Hosea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,330-01
EX PARTE WILLIAM HOSEA ENGLISH, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. B-17-0829-SA-W-1 IN THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
robbery and sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. The trial court made findings
of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant Applicant an out-of-time appeal.
There is not, however, a response from trial counsel in the record. He should be given the
opportunity to respond. See Rylander v. State, 101 S.W.3d 107, 111 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (“[T]rial
counsel should ordinarily be afforded an opportunity to explain his actions before being denounced 2
as ineffective.”). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial
court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold
a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
After reviewing trial counsel’s response, the trial court shall make further findings of fact and
conclusions of law as to whether Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because trial
counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of
fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s
claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be
requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 25, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
English, William Hosea, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/english-william-hosea-texcrimapp-2019.