English v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

English v. State

578 So. 2d 849, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4121, 1991 WL 68875

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in English v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 529 So. 2d 1272 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 1, 1991·No. No. 90-00310·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael English appeals his judgment and sentences following pleas of guilty to the crimes of burglary and attempted sexual battery. We conclude the only error concerns imposition of costs.

We affirm the judgment and sentences but strike court costs without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael English appeals his judgment and sentences following pleas of guilty to the crimes of burglary and attempted sexual battery. We conclude the only error concerns imposition of costs.

We affirm the judgment and sentences but strike court costs without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

English v. State, 578 So. 2d 849, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4121, 1991 WL 68875 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

578 So. 2d 849 (English v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.