English v. State

35 Ala. 428
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

R. W. WALKER, J.

There can be no doubt that, on the facts stated, the witness was as guilty of the offense proved by him, as the defendant. There are no accessories in misdemeanors, but all who are concerned in the commission of the offense, are principals.- — -Wharton’s Or. L. § 131; 1 Bishop’s Or. L.* §§ 82-6, 483-5. The witness is, therefore, to be treated as if he had himself played in the game; and on the authority of Davidson v. The State, 33 Ala. 350, we must hold, that the court erred [430]*430in deciding that he was not an accomplice, and that the defendant might be convicted on his individual testimony.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

English v. State, 35 Ala. 428 (Ala. 1860).

35 Ala. 428 (English v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawley v. State
73 So. 222 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Darden v. State
68 So. 550 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Gratton v. State
59 So. 183 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Boyd v. State
57 So. 1019 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Paul v. Paul
37 N.J. Eq. 23 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1883)
Moses v. State
58 Ala. 117 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Davis v. Orme
36 Ala. 540 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1860)