English v. Rosenkrantz

Court of Appeals of Georgia

English v. Rosenkrantz

111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 432, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 572

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1922

Docket10528

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 704 (English v. Rosenkrantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

English v. Rosenkrantz, 111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 432, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

An opinion in this case was rendered by this court, affirming the judgment of the superior court on both the main and the cross-bill of exceptions. See English v. Rosenkrantz, 26 Ga. App. 234 (105 S. E. 729). A writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court; and upon a hearing of the cause that court affirmed the ruling of this court as to the cross-bill of exceptions, and reversed our ruling as to the main bill of exceptions, holding that “ it was error to overrule the demurrer to the petition as amended.” For the full opinion see 152 Ga. 726 (111 S. E. 198). Under this ruling the judgment formerly rendered by this court must be vacated; and the judgment of the superior court is reversed upon the main bill of exceptions, and affirmed upon the cross-bill.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

An opinion in this case was rendered by this court, affirming the judgment of the superior court on both the main and the cross-bill of exceptions. See English v. Rosenkrantz, 26 Ga. App. 234 (105 S. E. 729). A writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court; and upon a hearing of the cause that court affirmed the ruling of this court as to the cross-bill of exceptions, and reversed our ruling as to the main bill of exceptions, holding that “ it was error to overrule the demurrer to the petition as amended.” For the full opinion see 152 Ga. 726 (111 S. E. 198). Under this ruling the judgment formerly rendered by this court must be vacated; and the judgment of the superior court is reversed upon the main bill of exceptions, and affirmed upon the cross-bill.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 432, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/english-v-rosenkrantz-gactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack