English v. Rosenkrantz

111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 432, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 572
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in English v. Rosenkrantz. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ga. App. 116
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1922·No. 10528·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

An opinion in this case was rendered by this court, affirming the judgment of the superior court on both the main and the cross-bill of exceptions. See English v. Rosenkrantz, 26 Ga. App. 234 (105 S. E. 729). A writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court; and upon a hearing of the cause that court affirmed the ruling of this court as to the cross-bill of exceptions, and reversed our ruling as to the main bill of exceptions, holding that “ it was error to overrule the demurrer to the petition as amended.” For the full opinion see 152 Ga. 726 (111 S. E. 198). Under this ruling the judgment formerly rendered by this court must be vacated; and the judgment of the superior court is reversed upon the main bill of exceptions, and affirmed upon the cross-bill.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

English v. Rosenkrantz, 111 S.E. 704, 28 Ga. App. 432, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 704 (English v. Rosenkrantz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

English v. Rosenkrantz
111 S.E. 198 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
English v. Rosenkrantz
105 S.E. 729 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)