English v. National Casualty Co.
33 Ohio Law. Abs. 670, 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 1123
Opinions
OPINION
The majority of this Court hold that «he judgment' of the Municipal Court of the City of Cleveland should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Application for rehearing is overruled. Exceptions may be noted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
English v. National Casualty Co., 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 670, 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 1123 (Ohio Ct. App. 1940).
33 Ohio Law. Abs. 670 (English v. National Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Western Casualty Co. v. Aarons
277 P. 811 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1929)
Benanti v. Delaware Insurance
84 A. 109 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1912)
New England Mutual Life Insurance v. LeVey
249 N.W. 854 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Wilson v. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co.
1932 OK 656 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Denlinger v. Union Natl Life Insurance
16 Ohio Law. Abs. 143 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1934)
Masonic Life Ass'n v. Robinson
147 S.W. 882 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Davidson
191 S.W. 961 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1917)
Smith v. Liberty Life Insurance
225 N.W. 688 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1929)