English v. Merroads Realty Corp.

41 N.E.2d 472, 288 N.Y. 93, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1059
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 23, 1942·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was no breach by the defendant landlord of its obligation to heat the apartment it let to the plaintiffs. There was no failure of its duty to maintain its heating apparatus with reasonable care. The oil burner did not become unsafe because a contractor was filling the oil tank. There was no reason why the defendant landlord should have expected that the workmen engaged in that ordinary task would spill oil on the cellar floor in quantity sufficient to reach the oil burner. Such a danger was not inherent in the work of filling the tank and the defendant landlord had no notice thereof.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs in all courts to abide the event. (See Hyman v. Barrett, 224 N. Y. 436.)

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

English v. Merroads Realty Corp., 41 N.E.2d 472, 288 N.Y. 93, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1059 (N.Y. 1942).

41 N.E.2d 472 (English v. Merroads Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eastern Airlines v. Joseph Guida & Sons Trucking Co.
675 F. Supp. 1391 (E.D. New York, 1987)
May v. 11½ East 49th Street Co.
269 A.D. 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Hamburger v. Bailey
36 A.2d 720 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1944)