English v. Heine

District Court, S.D. West Virginia·Decided August 7, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00540·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

CHARLESTON DIVISION

MARILYN ENGLISH,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00540

ELLEN HEINE, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner Marilyn English’s (“Petitioner”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 4.) By standing order filed in this case on November 29, 2022, (ECF No. 2), this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation for disposition (“PF&R”). Magistrate Judge Tinsley entered his PF&R on June 20, 2023, recommending this Court grant Petitioner’s Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 15.) This Court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, factual or legal conclusions contained within the PF&R to which no objections were addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and Plaintiff’s right to appeal this Court’s order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). In addition, this Court need not conduct a de novo review when a party “makes general and conclusory 1 objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate’s proposed findings and recommendations.” Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Objections to the PF&R in this case were due on July 7, 2023. To date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R, (ECF No. 15), and GRANTS Petitioner’s Motion to Remand. Further, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s request for an award of costs and actual expenses, including attomey fees, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) and ORDERS Petitioner to file a petition seeking said costs and expenses and providing supporting documentation for the amount requested. IT ISSO ORDERED. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: August 7, 2023 Et _ THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, CHIEF JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

English v. Heine, (S.D.W. Va. 2023).

English v. Heine (English v. Heine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.
727 F.2d 91 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Snyder v. Ridenour
889 F.2d 1363 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)