English v. Fairchild
This text of 5 Mich. 141 (English v. Fairchild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Here is no question reserved in accordance with the statute;— Comp. L. §3422. The whole case is, in fact, reserved, from which we are to find the questions raised, and to be passed upon by us, as we best may. These questions appear to be both of law and of fact. The rule in relation to questions reserved has been settled in the case of Bagg vs. The City of Detroit.
The case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Aute, p, 66: see also The People vs. Adwards, ante, p. 22.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Mich. 141, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/english-v-fairchild-mich-1858.