English v. Fairchild

Michigan Supreme Court

English v. Fairchild

5 Mich. 141, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 22

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Martin Ch. J.:

Here is no question reserved in accordance with the statute;— Comp. L. §3422. The whole case is, in fact, reserved, from which we are to find the questions raised, and to be passed upon by us, as we best may. These questions appear to be both of law and of fact. The rule in relation to questions reserved has been settled in the case of Bagg vs. The City of Detroit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin Ch. J.:

Here is no question reserved in accordance with the statute;— Comp. L. §3422. The whole case is, in fact, reserved, from which we are to find the questions raised, and to be passed upon by us, as we best may. These questions appear to be both of law and of fact. The rule in relation to questions reserved has been settled in the case of Bagg vs. The City of Detroit.

English v. Fairchild, 5 Mich. 141, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 22 (Mich. 1858).

Pincite

5 Mich. 141 (English v. Fairchild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related