Englis v. Davis
This text of 287 F. 136 (Englis v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These causes involve a question of fact only, and the solution of that question depends ultimately on one inquiry, viz.: Where was the Westfield when the Clermont was in the act of emerging from her slip? Reconciliation of all the evidence on this point is, we think, impossible. There was direct and positive testimony that at the moment above indicated the Westfield was so far downstream that she must have become the overtaking vessel long before collision. This evidence an experienced trial judge believed, after seeing -and hearing witnesses. ■ ■
We are not disposed to disturb that finding, and direct that the decrees appealed from be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 F. 136, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/englis-v-davis-ca2-1923.