Englese v. Hyde
166 A. 468, 111 N.J.L. 1, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 295
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mackay, above set out.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Uase, Heher, JJ. %.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Englese v. Hyde, 166 A. 468, 111 N.J.L. 1, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 295 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 468 (Englese v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Parker
258 A.2d 26 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Venetsky v. West Essex Bldg. Supply Co.
100 A.2d 291 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)