Englese v. Hyde

166 A. 468, 111 N.J.L. 1, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 295
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 166 A. 468 (Englese v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Englese v. Hyde, 166 A. 468, 111 N.J.L. 1, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 295 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mackay, above set out.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Uase, Heher, JJ. %.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Parker
258 A.2d 26 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Venetsky v. West Essex Bldg. Supply Co.
100 A.2d 291 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 468, 111 N.J.L. 1, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/englese-v-hyde-nj-1933.