ENGLESBOBB v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
ANTHONY ENGLESBOBB, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 1:22-cv-00351-GZS ) MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS, et al., ) ) Defendants )
ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
The Office of the Maine Attorney General seeks clarification as to which of the named defendants remain party to the case following the Court’s preliminary review of Plaintiff’s complaint, as amended. (Motion for Clarification, ECF No. 25.) The Court grants the motion. Following its preliminary review, the Court dismissed all Plaintiff’s claims except for Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process claim. (Order, ECF No. 23.) In his amended complaint, Plaintiff lists as defendants the Maine Department of Corrections and department officials Clancy, Snow, Theriault, Richards, and Dupperre. While Plaintiff made some specific allegations regarding certain defendants in the original complaint, in the amended complaint, Plaintiff alleged a due process claim referencing the conduct of a disciplinary committee and an appeals official. (Amended Complaint at 4-5, ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff did not directly allege that the named defendants were members of the disciplinary committee or whether one of the defendants served as an appeals official. Nevertheless, consistent with the Court’s obligation to “construe [Plaintiff’s] by lawyers,’” Waterman v. White Interior Sols., No. 2:19-cv-00032-JDL, 2019 WL 5764661, at *2 (D. Me. Nov. 5, 2019) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)), the Court construed Plaintiff’s amended complaint to allege that the named defendants
were involved in the alleged conduct that supports Plaintiff’s due process claim. In its dismissal order, therefore, the Court distinguished among the claims but not the defendants. Accordingly, at the present time, the named defendants remain party to the case on the due process claim. NOTICE
Any objections to this Order shall be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72.
/s/ John C. Nivison U.S. Magistrate Judge
Dated this 7th day of September, 2023.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ENGLESBOBB v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (ENGLESBOBB v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.