Engler v. Ellis
This text of 16 Ind. 475 (Engler v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by the appellees, against the appellants, upon two promissory notes, made in Ohio, by [476]*476the defendants to the plaintiffs, stipulating to pay interest at the rate of 10 per cent. Judgment by default, for the amount of the notes, with the stipulated interest.
Two errors are assigned: First. In rendering judgment for the amount of the notes with 10 per cent, interest, the notes being payable at the office of the appellants, in Shelby county, Indiana. Second. That process was not served upon the defendants in time.
There is nothing in the second error, as the record shows that process was duly served.
There are two conclusive answers to the first error assigned: First. The notes were payable generally, and were therefore payable everywhere, and not specially in Shelby county, Indiana. Second. If the notes were payable in Indiana, they would be good for the stipulated interest, unless that rate was prohibited by the law of Ohio, which does not appear. 2 Parsons on Cont., top page 96; Gordon v. Phelps; 7 J. J. Marshall, 619.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 475, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engler-v-ellis-ind-1861.