Engler v. Davis
18 Ind. 296
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages, because there is no error in the record. An answer to the whole of a cause of action, which goes only to a part of it, is bad. The judgment is affirmed accordingly, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Engler v. Davis, 18 Ind. 296 (Ind. 1862).
18 Ind. 296 (Engler v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yancy v. Teter
39 Ind. 305 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)