Englehard v. Schroeder
120 A. 737, 94 N.J. Eq. 778, 9 Stock. 778, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 687
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the memorandum filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor' Church.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, HepPENHEIMER,' GARDNER, ÁCKERSON, VAN BuSKIRK-12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Englehard v. Schroeder, 120 A. 737, 94 N.J. Eq. 778, 9 Stock. 778, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 687 (N.J. 1923).
120 A. 737 (Englehard v. Schroeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claycomb v. Kijakazi
D. Alaska, 2021
Masholie v. River Edge Estates, Inc.
37 A.2d 861 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)