Engle v. Wiseman

Supreme Court

Engle v. Wiseman

181 L. Ed. 2d 475, 132 S. Ct. 771, 565 U.S. 1051, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8365, 80 U.S.L.W. 3318

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 28, 2011

DocketNo. 11-6534

StatusPublished

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 475 (Engle v. Wiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Engle v. Wiseman, 181 L. Ed. 2d 475, 132 S. Ct. 771, 565 U.S. 1051, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8365, 80 U.S.L.W. 3318 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of [476]*476Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of [476]*476Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 L. Ed. 2d 475, 132 S. Ct. 771, 565 U.S. 1051, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8365, 80 U.S.L.W. 3318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engle-v-wiseman-scotus-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack