Engle v. Jones

51 Mo. 316
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJanuary 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 51 Mo. 316 (Engle v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Engle v. Jones, 51 Mo. 316 (Mo. 1873).

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have seen nothing objectionable in the record, except in the ruling óf the court, in reference to the question of damages. The other points were all fairly submitted, and the jury were the proper judges to pass upon them.

The action was in trespass for taking and converting two horses belonging to the plaintiff, and the court instructed the jury that if they found for the plaintiff, they should assess his damages at the actual value of the property when taken, unless the same was taken maliciously or wantonly, and in that case they might assess damages by way of smart money. No witness placed the value of the horses higher than one hundred and eighty dollars, and the jury returned a verdict for three hundred dollars.

As an abstract proposition of law the instruction was correct, but the objection to it is, there was no evidence in the case justifying it. No aggravating circumstances were disclosed calling forth the rule applicable to vindictive damages. Unless the trespass is committed in a wanton, rude or aggravated manner, indicating oppression, malice or a desire to [317]*317injure, the damages should be compensatory only. (Franz vs. Hilterbrand, et. al., 45 Mo., 121.)

As the evidence wholly failed to show any of these elements, the judgment should be reversed, and the cause remanded.

The other Judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Commercial Credit Corporation
335 S.W.2d 703 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1960)
Peak v. Taubman
158 S.W. 656 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1913)
Otto Kuehne Preserving Co. v. Allen
148 F. 666 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)
McNamara v. St. Louis Transit Co.
66 L.R.A. 486 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
Ickenroth v. St. Louis Transit Co.
77 S.W. 162 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. Smith
65 Ill. App. 319 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Carson v. Smith
34 S.W. 855 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
State ex rel. McClenden v. Jungling
22 S.W. 688 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Fulkerson v. Murdock
53 Mo. App. 151 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Witascheck v. Glass
46 Mo. App. 209 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Trauerman v. Lippincott
39 Mo. App. 478 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Prueitt v. Cheltenham Quarry Co.
33 Mo. App. 18 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1888)
Welsh v. Stewart
31 Mo. App. 376 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1888)
Brown v. Cape Girardeau Macadamized & Plank Road Co.
89 Mo. 152 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1886)
Bruce v. Ulery
79 Mo. 322 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Mo. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engle-v-jones-mo-1873.