Engle v. Haines

5 N.J. Eq. 186
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided December 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor;

Under the testimony in this cause, the twenty-four acre tract is first chargeable, to the extent of $500 and the interest due'on it from the date of the conveyance from Abraham Haines to Barclay Haines. If a mortgagor,-subsequently to the mortgage, sells and conveys a part of the mortgaged premises, an equity arises in favor of the purchaser, to have that part of the mortgaged premises which remains in the mortgagor first- sold for or towards the payment of the mortgage ; but if such subsequent purchaser agrees with the mortgagor that the part he buys shall be subject to the mortgage, and that the amount due on the mortgage shall be a part of the Consideration for the portion he buys, equity will not interpose to protect him, by subjecting the part of the mortgaged, premises remaining in the mortgagor to be first sold. A subsequent purchaser of such portion from the grantee of the mortgagor, with notice of the facts, has no better equity- against the mortgagor than- the first purchaser.

J cannot, under the circumstances, direct the portion remaining in the mortgagor-to be first-sold.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Engle v. Haines, 5 N.J. Eq. 186 (N.J. Ct. App. 1845).

5 N.J. Eq. 186 (Engle v. Haines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stuyvesant Security Co. v. Dreyer
143 A. 616 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)