Engle v. Betz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Engle v. Betz

63 A. 457, 214 Pa. 185, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 623

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 26, 1906

DocketAppeal, No. 339

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A. 457 (Engle v. Betz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Engle v. Betz, 63 A. 457, 214 Pa. 185, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 623 (Pa. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This case, as tbe learned judge remarked at the trial, was presented to the jury in a very unsatisfactory and fragmentary shape and the condition was not improved by the shifting and not altogether consistent forms in which the question was reserved on which judgment was entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto. The judges of this court who heard the argument being equally divided, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This case, as tbe learned judge remarked at the trial, was presented to the jury in a very unsatisfactory and fragmentary shape and the condition was not improved by the shifting and not altogether consistent forms in which the question was reserved on which judgment was entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto. The judges of this court who heard the argument being equally divided, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A. 457, 214 Pa. 185, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engle-v-betz-pa-1906.