ENGLE v. BERRYHILL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided March 31, 2021·No. 5:20-cv-00323·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CYNTHIA ENGLE, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 20-0323 : ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER : OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY : ADMINISTRATION,1 : Defendant. :

ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Judicial Review (Dkt. No.18), Defendant’s Response (Dkt. No. 19), the Defendant’s Response to the Court’s Order whether this case should be reversed and remanded for reconsideration by a properly appointed Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), pursuant Cirko ex rel. Cirko v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 948 F.3d 148 (3d Cir. 2020) (Dkt. No. 21), and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The relief sought by Plaintiff is GRANTED in part as described below; 2. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion filed this date, will be assigned to a different Constitutionally appointed ALJ for a new hearing and Decision; and 3. In all other respects, Plaintiff’s request for relief is DENIED. BY THE COURT:

_/s/ Henry S. Perkin__________ HENRY S. PERKIN United States Magistrate Judge

1 Andrew M. Saul became the Commissioner of Social Security in June 2019. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), he is automatically substituted as a party in place of Nancy A. Berryhill, who was Acting Commissioner from January 23, 2017 through June of 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ENGLE v. BERRYHILL, (E.D. Pa. 2021).

ENGLE v. BERRYHILL (ENGLE v. BERRYHILL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrew Cirko v. Commissioner Social Security
948 F.3d 148 (Third Circuit, 2020)