Engle, Mark Eugene
This text of Engle, Mark Eugene (Engle, Mark Eugene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
~-~- { ;:·' ,, . ;· ;_,·,
·, ...
_____\JLLJ_~ou_~ l~ec;e .£e>WM~. e.d: -~~lLesi ~-~~-e.-eeeZ"£ilL'j~-d_¥fud_JM . ----'--~-=--h~ p•r-o t--e9lec/_ fJ$,_JJDOI:'I_-~--I-ossJJo_L-e-1'---------. . -¥0-uv 1111L-e_tlAAtf__f!.QJ1m/eca_l/dt114-,t!-1-~-J-S----- -rtlc~S-!2('~/(a_l-~a_eJ_a;{_e/£_ _ __ ---~----~~--. _______j;;_44LL--lfau___ _ _______--==-' Sl~c£;;_¥,-- ~--·· -----~ . _- __ ·. ·~. ~~--=- -----~\~---------------------------·-· ..
.~\Ler__loe~ ..
__ • i ,, . .,
~~J-)M_#-:~~dd£ . ==iJZSl:~:th-fefM-~-~-;R__ -V"~: f:t:~~- ---------~- '
~~~-~-~-- ~-
- - - --·· -----~-~-------- · - - - - ·-
---;---------·-------------·---------------------------------~---·------------ ' '
;r W296-81587-98-HC
Ex parte Mark Eugene Engle § In the § § 296th Judicial District Court § § of Collin County, Texas
Response to Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus
The State of Texas files this Response to Application for Writ of
Habeas Corpus:
1.
Mark Eugene Engle (Applicant) pleaded guilty to delivery of a
controlled substance in penalty group 1, in an amount of more than 4 grams
but less than 200 grams. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial
court sentenced Applicant to twenty-five years' confinement.
2.
Applicant did not appeal his conviction.
3.
On June 22, 2015, the Clerk served the State with the instant writ
application.
20Hi JUN 30 PM 2: 25 1 ANDREA STROH THOHPSON DISTRICT CLERK C~,. ' "OUNTY.,JEXAS. !lY· ~ _ --· .:::t;:':r-;-r-. . . :T.H:-PUT.Y·· 4.
In a sole ground for relief, Applicant alleges that he was denied due
process when the trial court assessed court costs without first determining
whether he had the financial resources to pay those costs.
5.
A. Court Costs
In his sole ground for relief, Applicant alleges that the trial court
should have determined whether he had the financial resources to pay court
costs before being ordering him to pay costs. Court cost complaints are not
"the proper subject of a statutorily governed post-conviction application for
writ of habeas corpus." Ex parte Knight, 401 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2013). Applicant's sole ground for relief should be dismissed. See id.
2 Respectfully submitted,
Greg Willis Criminal District Attorney
phy District Attorney
2100 Bloomdale Rd., Ste. 200 McKinney, Texas 75071 (972) 548-4323 (214) 491-4860 fax
3 .-
Certificate of Service
A copy of the foregoing document has been served on Applicant,
Mark Eugene Engle, TDCJ # 1958430, Connally Unit, 899 FM 632,
Kenedy, TX 78119, on June 30, 2015.
4 W296-81587-98-HC
Ex parte MarkEugene Engle § In the § § 296th Judicial District Court § § of Collin County, Texas
Order
The Court, having reviewed Applicant's Application for Writ of
Habeas Corpus and the State's Response, FINDS that:
1) Applicant's sole ground for relief complains of court costs assessed;
2) Court cost complaints are not the proper subject of a statutorily
governed post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus.
Accordingly, this Court recommends that the Court of Criminal Appeals DISMISS Applicant's Application.
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send copies of the Order to: (1) the Court of Criminal Appeals; (2) Applicant, Mark Eugene Engle, TDCJ # 1958430, Connally Unit, 899 FM 632, Kenedy, TX 78119; and (3) the Appellate Division of the Collin County Criminal District Attorney's Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the District Clerk shall immediately transmit to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy of Applicant's Application, the State's Response, and this Order.
1 SIGNED this _ _ day of _ _ _, 2015.
JUDGE PRESIDING
2 -' I 1
·\: .• ;;
W296-81588-98-HC
Ex parte Mark Eugene Engle § In the § § 296th Judicial District Court § § of Collin County, Texas
The State of Texas files this Response to Application for Writ of
Mark Eugene Engle (Applicant) pleaded guilty to delivery of a
controlled substance in penalty group 1, in an amount of more than 4 grams
but less than 200 grams. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial
court sentenced Applicant to twenty-five years' confinement.
On June 22, 2015, the Clerk served the State with the instant writ
1 2015 JUN 30 PH 2,: 21+ ANDREA STROH THQJ"'?SON DISTRICT CLERK ·. CO~HY.,~~XAS ,B:Y.~~I{fjf-·~· ..,~PUTY 4.
In a sole ground for relief, Applicant alleges that he was denied due
process when the trial court assessed court costs without first determining
In his sole ground for relief, Applicant alleges that the trial court
should have determined whether he had the financial resources to pay court
costs before being ordering him to pay costs. Court cost complaints are not
"the proper subject of a statutorily governed post-conviction application for
writ of habeas corpus." Ex parte Knight, 401 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2013). Applicant's sole ground for relief should be dismissed. See id.
lo Murphy Assista riminal District Attorney SBT #24041545 2100 Bloomdale Rd., Ste. 200 McKinney, Texas 75071 (972) 548-4323 (214) 491-4860 fax
3 Certificate of Service
A copy of the foregoing document has been served on Applicant,
Mark Eugene Engle, TDCJ # 1958430, Connally Unit, 899 FM 632,
4 W296-81588-98-HC
Ex parte Mark Eugene Engle § In the § § 296th Judicial District Court § § of Collin County, Texas
The Court, having reviewed Applicant's Application for Writ of
1) Applicant's sole ground for relief complains of court costs assessed;
2) Court cost complaints are not the proper subject of a statutorily
governed post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus.
Accordingly, this Court recommends that the Court of Criminal Appeals DISMISS Applicant's Application.
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send copies of the Order to: (1) the Court of Criminal Appeals; (2) Applicant, Mark Eugene Engle, TDCJ # 1958430, Connally Unit, 899 FM 632, Kenedy, TX 78119; and (3) the Appellate Division of the Collin County Criminal District Attorney's Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the District Clerk shall immediately transmit to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy of Applicant's Application, the State's Response, and this Order.
1 ..
SIGNED this - - day of - - -, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Engle, Mark Eugene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engle-mark-eugene-texapp-2015.