Englander v. Societe Anonyme De La Benedictine Distillerie

Third Circuit

Englander v. Societe Anonyme De La Benedictine Distillerie

87 F.2d 1003, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2846

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 18, 1936

DocketNo. 5719

StatusPublished

This text of 87 F.2d 1003 (Englander v. Societe Anonyme De La Benedictine Distillerie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Englander v. Societe Anonyme De La Benedictine Distillerie, 87 F.2d 1003, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2846 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the trade-mark rights to the manufacture of Benedictine, a well-known French liquer. The litigated cases over the right to that name will be found in many places in legal literature and call for no restatement here.

After careful examination of the proofs we are satisfied the court below committed no error in its decree enjoining the defendants from using the word “Benedictine” in the sale of their product.

So holding, the decree below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the trade-mark rights to the manufacture of Benedictine, a well-known French liquer. The litigated cases over the right to that name will be found in many places in legal literature and call for no restatement here.

After careful examination of the proofs we are satisfied the court below committed no error in its decree enjoining the defendants from using the word “Benedictine” in the sale of their product.

So holding, the decree below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 F.2d 1003, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/englander-v-societe-anonyme-de-la-benedictine-distillerie-ca3-1936.