Englander v. Leslie Kleyman Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Englander v. Leslie Kleyman Corp.

31 A.D.2d 607, 295 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 607 (Englander v. Leslie Kleyman Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Englander v. Leslie Kleyman Corp., 31 A.D.2d 607, 295 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered March 13, 1968, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of directing .that the examination shall be held in conformity with defendant’s offer at page A-14 of plaintiff’s appendix, as detailed in the order to be settled hereon, and as so modified the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The alleged defects in the notice of examination are not material. Defendant’s suggested procedure is in general accord with practice deemed fair in similar situations (cf. Robinson v. Wildenstein & Co., 23 A D 2d 740). Settle order on notice. Concur—Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered March 13, 1968, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of directing .that the examination shall be held in conformity with defendant’s offer at page A-14 of plaintiff’s appendix, as detailed in the order to be settled hereon, and as so modified the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The alleged defects in the notice of examination are not material. Defendant’s suggested procedure is in general accord with practice deemed fair in similar situations (cf. Robinson v. Wildenstein & Co., 23 A D 2d 740). Settle order on notice. Concur—Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 607, 295 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/englander-v-leslie-kleyman-corp-nyappdiv-1968.