Englander Co. v. Tishler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Englander Co. v. Tishler

280 A.D. 217, 112 N.Y.S.2d 611

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 217 (Englander Co. v. Tishler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Englander Co. v. Tishler, 280 A.D. 217, 112 N.Y.S.2d 611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Order granting temporary injunction reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Order denying defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

No complaint has been made as to the contents of the pickets’ signs displayed or leaflets distributed by them. The question before us on this appeal is the right of the defendants to picket at all in front of a store selling Englander products. We hold that defendants are entitled to picket to convey to the public the information that Englander employees are on strike and to ask the public not to buy Englander products. This case therefore falls within section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act. (See Goldfinger v. Feintuch, 276 N. Y. 281.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Order granting temporary injunction reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Order denying defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

No complaint has been made as to the contents of the pickets’ signs displayed or leaflets distributed by them. The question before us on this appeal is the right of the defendants to picket at all in front of a store selling Englander products. We hold that defendants are entitled to picket to convey to the public the information that Englander employees are on strike and to ask the public not to buy Englander products. This case therefore falls within section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act. (See Goldfinger v. Feintuch, 276 N. Y. 281.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D. 217, 112 N.Y.S.2d 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/englander-co-v-tishler-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack