Engineer Co. v. Senn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Engineer Co. v. Senn

86 N.Y.S. 1115, 92 A.D. 616

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 1115 (Engineer Co. v. Senn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Engineer Co. v. Senn, 86 N.Y.S. 1115, 92 A.D. 616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff is entitled to the particulars of the demand contained in the eighth clause of the answer, stating the persons employed by the defendant to do the work therein alleged, and the necessary materials procured by the defendant, and which is alleged to amount to the sum of $1,062.35.. The plaintiff can have no knowledge of persons employed by the defendant, or the materials procured by him in the performance of the plaintiff’s obligations, and to that extent the motion should have been granted. In other respects, we think the application was properly denied.

The order should be reversed, and the defendant required to furnish a bill of particulars as above indicated, without costs of this appeal-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff is entitled to the particulars of the demand contained in the eighth clause of the answer, stating the persons employed by the defendant to do the work therein alleged, and the necessary materials procured by the defendant, and which is alleged to amount to the sum of $1,062.35.. The plaintiff can have no knowledge of persons employed by the defendant, or the materials procured by him in the performance of the plaintiff’s obligations, and to that extent the motion should have been granted. In other respects, we think the application was properly denied.

The order should be reversed, and the defendant required to furnish a bill of particulars as above indicated, without costs of this appeal-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.Y.S. 1115, 92 A.D. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engineer-co-v-senn-nyappdiv-1904.