Engert v. Commissioner

1990 T.C. Memo. 50, 58 T.C.M. 1319, 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 50
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJanuary 29, 1990
DocketDocket No. 12649-88
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1990 T.C. Memo. 50 (Engert v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Engert v. Commissioner, 1990 T.C. Memo. 50, 58 T.C.M. 1319, 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 50 (tax 1990).

Opinion

RICHARD A. ENGERT, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Engert v. Commissioner
Docket No. 12649-88
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1990-50; 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 50; 58 T.C.M. (CCH) 1319; T.C.M. (RIA) 90050;
January 29, 1990; As corrected January 29, 1990
Richard A. Engert, pro se.
Theodore R. Leighton and Steven Diamond, for the respondent.

COLVIN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

*51 COLVIN, Judge: This Court has previously decided the issues relating to the deficiency and additions to tax in this case. The sole remaining issue is respondent's Motion To Impose Damages Under I.R.C. Section 6673. 1 The Court grants respondent's Motion in that we award damages to the United States in the amount of $ 2,500.

Respondent determined deficiencies in and additions to petitioner's Federal income taxes as follows:

Additions to Tax
YearDeficiencySec. 6653(a)(1)Sec. 6653(a)(2)Sec. 6661
1984$ 5,198.00$ 259.9050% of the$ 1,299,50
interest due
on $ 5,198.00
1985$ 5,154.00$ 257.7050% of the$ 1,288.50
interest due
on $ 5,154.00

The issues presented at trial were: (1) whether petitioner was entitled to deduct charitable contributions in the amount of $ 35,958 for 1984 and $ 37,181 for 1985; (2) whether petitioner was liable for additions*52 to tax under sections 6653(a)(1) and (2) for negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulations for 1984 and 1985; and (3) whether petitioner was liable for additions to tax under section 6661 for substantial understatement of income tax for 1984 and 1985.

The Court rendered a Bench Opinion in this case pursuant to the authority granted under section 7459(b) and Rule 152. In that Opinion, the Court held that petitioner was not entitled to the claimed charitable deductions for 1984 and 1985. The Court also found the petitioner liable for additions to tax under sections 6653(a)(1) and (2). Finally, the Court found the petitioner liable for additions to tax under section 6661 because petitioner substantially understated his income tax liability for 1984 and 1985 and petitioner's Church of Modern Enlightenment constituted a tax shelter organized for the principal purpose of avoiding or evading Federal income tax under section 6661(b)(2)(C)(ii).

FINDINGS OF FACT

Petitioner resided in Brooklyn, New York, when he filed his petition in this case. During 1984 and 1985, petitioner was employed by the New York City Transit Authority as a maintenance supervisor. He received*53 wages of $ 36,347 in 1984 and $ 37,567 for 1985. Petitioner timely filed income tax returns for both years.

Petitioner is a self-proclaimed minister of the Church of Modern Enlightenment. He has no formal theological educational training. All of petitioner's personal living expenses are paid by the so-called church. The so-called church has incurred no expenses for religious services, articles, or supplies. It has no congregation other than its three trustees: the petitioner; Phyllis Engert, petitioner's sister; and Sanford Kleinman, who also has a purported church of which petitioner is a trustee. See Good Friendship Temple v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-313, and Kleinman v. Commissioner (bench opinion, affirmed by the Second Circuit in an unpublished opinion dated June 6, 1986, No. 86-4014).

Petitioner deducted $ 35,958 as a charitable contribution to the so-called Church of Modern Enlightenment in 1984 and $ 37,181 in 1985. Respondent's notice of deficiency disallowed the charitable deduction for both years.

Petitioner refused to meet informally with respondent as required by BranertonCorp. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 691 (1974),*54 and did not acknowledge respondent's attempts to schedule an informal conference.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruberto v. Cir
873 F.2d 1436 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Branerton Corp. v. Commissioner
61 T.C. No. 73 (U.S. Tax Court, 1974)
Svedahl v. Commissioner
89 T.C. No. 21 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Burwell v. Commissioner
89 T.C. No. 41 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Horn v. Commissioner
90 T.C. No. 60 (U.S. Tax Court, 1988)
Engert v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 199 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Mone v. Commissioner
774 F.2d 570 (Second Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1990 T.C. Memo. 50, 58 T.C.M. 1319, 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engert-v-commissioner-tax-1990.