Enger v. Luepke

878 S.W.2d 519, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 1994 WL 283152
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 1994·No. No. 64817·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Daniel Luepke, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Charles requiring him to refund $300.00 to respondent, Gerry S. Enger, [520]*520on a membership purchased by respondent in appellant’s hunt club. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgement of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enger v. Luepke, 878 S.W.2d 519, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 1994 WL 283152 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

878 S.W.2d 519 (Enger v. Luepke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.