Home/Third Circuit/Engelhart v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Engelhart v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

127 F.3d 1095, 1997 WL 569214
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 5, 1997·No. 96-1920·Published

Opinion

127 F.3d 1095

Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23939Y
Paul J. Engelhart, William J. Mcilfatrick, H.C. Kohout, Carl
C. Brandt, Lawrence Cirillo, Charles D. Nester, Thomas F.
Meehan, Jr., Jacqueline A. Mace, Donald E. Kraft, Robert E.
Graham, (Englehart Subclass), William J. Mcilfatrick,
(Mcilfatrick Disability Subclass), William J. Mcilfatrick,
(Mcilfatrick Offset Subclass) Jacqueline A. Mace (Mace Subclass)
v.
Consolidated Rail Corporation, Supplemental Pension Plan of
Consolidated Rail

NO. 96-1920

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Aug 05, 1997

Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.92cv07056 ,

Buckwalter, J.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Engelhart v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 127 F.3d 1095, 1997 WL 569214 (3d Cir. 1997).

127 F.3d 1095 (Engelhart v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.