Engelhardt v. Engelhardt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Engelhardt v. Engelhardt

282 A.D. 707, 122 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4750

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 707 (Engelhardt v. Engelhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Engelhardt v. Engelhardt, 282 A.D. 707, 122 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of separation as directs him to pay plaintiff the sum of $600 per month for the support of plaintiff and the daughter of their marriage, and grants leave to plaintiff to apply for an increase of said stun after six months, in the event she “has not obtained a satisfactory disposition' of” certain claims against defendant with respect to certain bank accounts, securities and other property. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, modified on the law by striking out the fourth ordering paragraph. As so modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The findings of fact, which were before this court for consideration, are affirmed. The granting of leave to apply for an increase at a future time was not warranted. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of separation as directs him to pay plaintiff the sum of $600 per month for the support of plaintiff and the daughter of their marriage, and grants leave to plaintiff to apply for an increase of said stun after six months, in the event she “has not obtained a satisfactory disposition' of” certain claims against defendant with respect to certain bank accounts, securities and other property. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, modified on the law by striking out the fourth ordering paragraph. As so modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The findings of fact, which were before this court for consideration, are affirmed. The granting of leave to apply for an increase at a future time was not warranted. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 707, 122 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engelhardt-v-engelhardt-nyappdiv-1953.