Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp. v. Fisher-Park Lane Co.
This text of 50 A.D.2d 534 (Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp. v. Fisher-Park Lane Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 12, 1975, which granted defendant-landlord’s cross motion to stay this action pending arbitration and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disburse[535]*535ments of this appeal to respondent. It is the contention of the plaintiff-tenant that the lease arrangement with respect to rent calling for rent escalations based on increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses with a ceiling in each year, is so clear and unambiguous that there is nothing really to arbitrate. While the substantive legal point with respect to the lease is not free from doubt, CPLR 7501 states as follows: "In determining any matter arising under this article, the court shall not consider whether the claim with respect to which arbitration is sought is tenable, or otherwise pass upon the merits of the dispute.” (See Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. v Investors Ins. Co. of Amer., 37 NY2d 91, 96.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Murphy and Lupiano, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 534, 375 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engelhard-minerals-chemicals-corp-v-fisher-park-lane-co-nyappdiv-1975.