Engel v. Univ. of Toledo College of Medicine

939 N.E.2d 864, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1495
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 7, 2011·No. 2009-1735·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 09AP-53, 184 Ohio App.3d 669, 2009-Ohio-3957. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of amicus curiae Dr. Marek Skoskiewicz’s motion to participate in oral argument scheduled for Tuesday, February 1, 2011,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Amicus curiae Dr. Marek Skoskiewicz shall be allotted ten minutes for oral argument. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.5, appellant and appellee shall still be allotted fifteen minutes each for oral argument.

Oral argument shall proceed as follows: appellant’s case-in-chief; appellee’s response; amicus curiae Dr. Marek Skoskiewicz’s argument in support of neither party; and appellant’s rebuttal, if any.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Engel v. Univ. of Toledo College of Medicine, 939 N.E.2d 864, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2011).

939 N.E.2d 864 (Engel v. Univ. of Toledo College of Medicine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Engel v. University of Toledo College of Medicine
922 N.E.2d 244 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)