Engel v. Univ. of Toledo College of Medicine
This text of 939 N.E.2d 864 (Engel v. Univ. of Toledo College of Medicine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Franklin App. No. 09AP-53, 184 Ohio App.3d 669, 2009-Ohio-3957. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of amicus curiae Dr. Marek Skoskiewicz’s motion to participate in oral argument scheduled for Tuesday, February 1, 2011,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Amicus curiae Dr. Marek Skoskiewicz shall be allotted ten minutes for oral argument. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.5, appellant and appellee shall still be allotted fifteen minutes each for oral argument.
Oral argument shall proceed as follows: appellant’s case-in-chief; appellee’s response; amicus curiae Dr. Marek Skoskiewicz’s argument in support of neither party; and appellant’s rebuttal, if any.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
939 N.E.2d 864, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engel-v-univ-of-toledo-college-of-medicine-ohio-2011.